Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 05:53

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
States Are Making It Easier to Get Ivermectin - Newser
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Enim eius molestiae qui iste impedit qui voluptatem iste.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
New model helps to figure out which distant planets may host life - Space
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Emmy nominations voting ends tonight. Here's what our critic hopes will make the cut - NPR
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.